M Night Shyamalan faces $81 million copyright trial over OTT show ‘Servant’

0
3

Her attorney, Patrick Arenz, showed jurors clips of both projects during his opening statement on Tuesday in federal court in Riverside, California. When it was the defence’s turn, attorney Brittany Amadi argued that Basgallop began developing the show years before ‘The Truth About Emanuel’ was released

Published Date – 15 January 2025, 05:44 PM


M Night Shyamalan faces $81 million copyright trial over OTT show ‘Servant’

Manoj Night Shyamalan and Apple TV are being sued for $81 million over the show ‘Servant’

Hollywood filmmaker M Night Shyamalan is facing a trial over allegations that he copied from an independent film to make the streaming show ‘Servant’.

The show streams on Apple TV+. Francesca Gregorini, an Italy born director, is suing Shyamalan and Apple for $81 million, alleging that the show stole key elements from her 2013 movie, ‘The Truth About Emanuel’, reports ‘Variety’.


Her attorney, Patrick Arenz, showed jurors clips of both projects during his opening statement on Tuesday in federal court in Riverside, California.

As per ‘Variety’, he argued that both depict a delusional mother who cares for a doll as though it is a real baby, and a nanny who is complicit in the delusion.

“This is a simple case,” Arenz told the jury. “There would be no ‘Servant’ without ‘Emanuel’.”

When it was the defence’s turn, attorney Brittany Amadi argued that Basgallop began developing the show years before ‘The Truth About Emanuel’ was released, and that those involved with the show never drew on the film.

“Ms. Gregorini is seeking a windfall here,” Amadi said. ‘She’s seeking $81 million for work she didn’t do. The truth is the creators of ‘Servant’ do not owe anything to Ms. Gregorini.” Gregorini sued in January 2020, shortly after ‘Servant’, debuted on the platform.

A federal judge initially threw out the case a few months later, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals revived it in 2022, finding a genuine dispute over whether the two works are “substantially similar”.

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied Apple’s motion for summary judgment in November, ordering that the suit would have to be settled by a jury.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here